====== Differences ====== This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
|
soc:2010:peper:journal:week11 [2010/08/08 07:01] peper |
soc:2010:peper:journal:week11 [2010/08/08 07:04] (current) peper |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| I was a bit overoptimistic about linker stripping unused functions. | I was a bit overoptimistic about linker stripping unused functions. | ||
| - | It turns out that functions are linked with object granularity so adding ''strtoull()'' to ''core/misc.c'' which is used only on linux was in fact included in other builds as well. | + | It turns out that functions are linked with object granularity so adding ''strtoull()'' to ''core/misc.c'' which is used only on linux was in fact growing other builds as well. |
| - | Moved it to a separate object ''core/strtoull.c''. | + | Moved it to a separate object ''core/strtoull.c'' to eliminate that problem. |
| - | That makes me wonder whether we have any dead functions that can be nuked to reduce size. On a similar note [[http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html|gcc 4.5.0]] introduced whole program optimizations, which might be worth looking into. | + | That makes me wonder whether we have any dead functions that can be nuked to reduce size. Also on a similar note [[http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html|gcc 4.5.0]] introduced whole program optimizations, which might be worth looking into. |
| Although I'm waiting for ''4.5.1'' as it also introduced some nasty regressions that are quite noticable on a source-based distro like [[http://www.exherbo.org|exherbo]] that I'm using. | Although I'm waiting for ''4.5.1'' as it also introduced some nasty regressions that are quite noticable on a source-based distro like [[http://www.exherbo.org|exherbo]] that I'm using. | ||
